Close Menu
SavvyDime
    What's Hot

    What is Zero-Based Budgeting?

    July 22, 2021

    Understanding Your Investment Risk Tolerance

    July 23, 2021

    5 Incredible Money-Saving Hacks

    August 9, 2021
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram RSS
    SavvyDime
    • Technology
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Legal
    SavvyDime
    Home » 16 US States Sue Apple for Its iPhone Monopoly, Violating Antitrust Laws

    16 US States Sue Apple for Its iPhone Monopoly, Violating Antitrust Laws

    By Alyssa MillerMarch 21, 20245 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email
    The large glass windows of an Apple Store
    Source: Jonathan Cutrer/Flickr
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    16 U.S. states, along with the District of Columbia and the Justice Department, have collectively filed a lawsuit against Apple. This legal action targets the federal government’s efforts to curb the influence of one of the world’s largest technology companies.

    In the lawsuit, the federal government contends that Apple violated antitrust laws, thereby creating obstacles for consumers in selecting alternative smart device products.

    The Lawsuit Accuses Apple of Monopolizing

    Source: Picjumbo/Pexels

    The 88-page lawsuit alleges that Apple violates antitrust laws by fostering customer dependence on its products, including the iPhone, Apple Watch, and MacBooks.

    This reliance challenges consumers to transition to alternative devices, establishing Apple’s dominance in the market as a tech giant monopoly.

    Some Monopolies Are Illegal

    Source: Tima Miroshnichenko/Pexels

    In the U.S., monopolies are not entirely prohibited, but strict laws are enforced to prevent their formation.

    Employing unfair tactics to monopolize a market instead of engaging in fair competition harms both consumers and businesses.

    Apple Shuts Out Competition on the iPhone

    Source: cottonbro studio/Pexels

    The lawsuit alleges that the tech giant prevents other companies from developing applications that compete with Apple products, including its digital wallet.

    According to the government, these applications could diminish the value of the iPhone. However, Apple’s policies are criticized for harming consumers and smaller companies, as they do not receive the best service from Apple.

    The Lawsuit Breaks Down Apple’s Successful Devices and Services

    Source: Tingey Injury Law Firm/Unsplash

    “Each step in Apple’s course of conduct built and reinforced the moat around its smartphone monopoly,” the government said in the lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

    This lawsuit is the result of years of government officials closely examining Apple’s successful devices and services.

    The Uneven Playing Field 

    The success of the iPhone has propelled Apple to a $2.75 trillion valuation, making it the world’s most valuable company. Despite its remarkable achievement, Apple has faced criticism due to the user experience on iPhones and other devices, with some arguing that the company has created an uneven playing field.

    Core features of Apple’s iPhones have become deeply integrated into people’s daily routines, making it challenging for consumers to transition to other smartphone brands. This reliance on Apple’s brand has further solidified its position in the market.

    The Accessibility of the iPhone With Apple Products

    Source: Pixabay/Pexels

    The tech company claims that its new, more secure smartphone is outperforming both app developers and rival devices.

    While Apple products have undoubtedly enhanced consumers’ lives, the absence of competition has given Apple undue advantage, resulting in the release of smartphones with inflated prices and diminished innovation. This apparent disregard for antitrust laws raises concerns about fair market practices.

    Apple Pushes Against the Lawsuit

    Source: Jess Bailey Designs/Pexels

    “This lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets,” an Apple spokeswoman said (via the New York Times).

    “If successful, it would hinder our ability to create the kind of technology people expect from Apple—where hardware, software, and services intersect. It would also set a dangerous precedent, empowering the government to take a heavy hand in designing people’s technology.”

    How Will This Affect You?

    Source: Wikimedia Commons

    The implications of the lawsuit on consumers remain unclear. The ongoing legal battle between the government and Apple may persist for years as they seek a mutually beneficial compromise.

    The lawsuit directly challenges Apple’s practice of blocking cloud-streaming apps. This practice, according to the lawsuit, impedes communication between different smartphone operating systems and limits consumer choice for digital wallets.

    This Isn’t Apple’s First Antitrust Challenge

    Source: Porapak Apichodilok/Pexels

    Apple has been facing various antitrust challenges for several years. In 2020, Epic Games sued Apple’s App Store over its policies. Apple defended these policies by arguing that customers could easily switch between the iPhone operating system and Google’s Android system.

    This argument aimed to justify that the App Store policies were not the determining factor for why consumers prefer the iPhone over other smartphones.

    Antitrust Challenges in the Modern Tech-Era

    Source: (PhotoMIX Company Pexels)

    Apple isn’t the only tech giant to face allegations of antitrust violations. Google’s search business and advertising technology have become recent targets for the Justice Department.

    The Federal Trade Commission sued Meta after the company purchased Instagram and WhatsApp, challenging its dominance. Amazon has also been accused of abusing its power as it dominates the online retail space.

    Is the Era of Modern Tech Fair? 

    Source: Torsten Dettlaff/Pexels

    “This case is about technology,” said Colin Kass, an antitrust lawyer at Proskauer Rose. “Can the antitrust laws force a company to redesign its product to make it more compatible with competitors’ products?”

    “Competition makes devices more private and more secure,” said Jonathan Kanter, assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “In many instances, Apple’s conduct has made its ecosystem less private and less secure.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Alyssa Miller

    Alyssa Miller is a writer, editor, and educator with a passion for entertainment and pop culture. She graduated from the University of San Francisco with a Bachelor of Arts in English and a minor in Communications. Before graduating, Alyssa worked as a freelance entertainment and film education writer, contributing to a variety of publications, including Britain’s First Frame Magazine. She also continued to write short stories and screenplays in her free time.

    Comments are closed.

    Trending

    Walmart Lawsuit Results in the Retailer Paying $35 Million to Former Employee it Accused of Fraud

    November 27, 2024

    Advance Auto Parts Closes Hundreds of Stores and Lays Off Staff to Avoid Bankruptcy

    November 27, 2024

    Rare Comic Books That are Extremely Valuable Today

    November 26, 2024

    Which Family Dollar Stores are Closing?

    November 26, 2024
    Savvy Dime Makes You Savvy

    Savvy Dime provides personal business and financial analysis on the topics around the world impacting your wallet and marketplace.

    We are dedicated to delivering engaging and accurate news content that keeps you informed and equips you with the information you need to make practical personal financial decisions and grow your wealth.

    savvy dime logo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Standards
    • Terms of Use
    © 2025 Savvy Dime and Decido.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.