The ruling comes from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in St. Louis.

The plaintiffs in the case alleged that the enforcement of the age limit violated the Second Amendment rights of 18-20-year-olds under the Constitution.

“Importantly, the Second Amendment’s plain text does not have an age limit,” wrote U.S. 8th Circuit Judge Duane Benton in the ruling.

“Minnesota has not met its burden to proffer sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that 18 to 20-year-olds seeking to carry handguns in public for selfdefense are protected by the right to keep and bear arms. The Carry Ban, § 624.714 subd. 2(b)(2), violates the Second Amendment as applied to Minnesota through the Fourteenth Amendment, and, thus, is unconstitutional,” wrote Benton.

It also states that it is within the rights of the people of the US to keep and bear arms and that this cannot be infringed.

The Second Amendment essentially means that all Americans have the right to own and carry firearms to protect themselves against threats and that the government is unable to interfere with this right.

This is an example of the 2022 Supreme Court case, the Bruen decision, which overturned nationwide gun laws. This decision divided courts and resulted in some confusion as to which restrictions could still remain in place.

It included the right for Americans to carry firearms in public for self-defense purposes and establishing a new test for evaluating challenges to gun restrictions. Courts now have to ask themselves whether any imposed restrictions are in keeping with the country’s historic firearm regulations.

The federal age limit for this right is 18 years old.

“Those laws, still in effect, prevent the mentally ill from acquiring firearms. Minnesota may not claim all 18 to 20-year-olds are comparable to the mentally ill. This court declines to read a new category into the list of presumptively lawful statutes,” Benton wrote.

He also made it clear how troubling the ruling is, especially as it came just a few days after a 20-year-old fired shots at former President Donald Trump during a rally in Pennsylvania.

Many people in the US want an increase in safety, which they believe can only happen by imposing restrictions on guns.

All three judges have been appointed by Republican presidents and determined that recent Supreme Court rulings have expanded gun rights to the point that the Minnesota law can no longer stand.

Both Republicans and Democrats strongly believe that there should be background checks on people purchasing guns, people with mental illnesses should be prevented from purchasing guns, and family members should be able to go to court if they are worried that a gun owner might harm themselves or others.

There are also differences when it comes to schools, with Democrats being against teachers and school officials carrying guns in K-12 schools, whereas Republicans are in favor of this. Republicans also tend to believe that the right to own a gun is more important than protecting people from gun violence, whereas Democrats are completely against this.

The opinion in the case, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, asserted that the US Constitution establishes “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”

“Good morning all, This week we kicked Keith Ellison’s *ss at the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals,” the group wrote. Keith Ellison is the Attorney General for Minnesota and has defended the 2003 law.

“We’re already plotting who we should sue next as we work to take down the disarmament regime here in Minnesota – and we’re aiming to put a Pro-2A legislature in the Minnesota House,” wrote the group on X.

“Today the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court’s opinion which struck down Minnesota’s ban on carry for young adults as unconstitutional,” said an X post by the group.

Another case involved Mexico, which was able to win a $10 billion lawsuit against US gunmakers, as guns being made in the US were ending up in the hands of cartels.

Georgia, Illinois, and Pennsylvania are all examples of states that have tried to impose laws on age groups able to purchase firearms. Still, the Constitution and courts have always remained strong in their stance.

However, this isn’t good news for campaigners for gun safety. There is the belief that should this happen, it will be challenging to regulate guns or keep schools and communities safe, especially when it is already pretty hard to do this.

He has proposed a 28th Amendment to the US Constitution that would ban people under 21 from buying firearms, ban assault weapons, and mandate universal background checks. However, with this recent decision in Minnesota, there is doubt over whether this will happen.

“It is encouraging that yet another circuit court has correctly concluded that 18-20-year-olds are part of ‘the People’ to which the Second Amendment extends. SAF remains steadfast in its commitment to ensure that young adults are able to fully exercise their constitutional right to keep and bear arms,” said the SAF post.