Instant Backlash: Southern California District Sues Over Newsom’s New Gender Law

By: Georgia | Last updated: Jul 22, 2024

The Chino Valley Unified School District in Southern California has launched a lawsuit against Governor Gavin Newsom. 

They’re challenging a new law that prevents school districts from notifying parents if their child changes their gender identity. The district argues this infringes on parents’ constitutional rights.

A Legal Battle Over Parental Rights

“School officials do not have the right to keep secrets from parents, but parents do have a constitutional right to know what their minor children are doing at school,” states Emily Rae, the lawyer for the district.

Advertisement
Rear view of a school bus parked under a clear sky with trees in the background

Source: Element5 Digital/Unsplash

This lawsuit highlights a significant clash over the balance between student privacy and parental rights.

Advertisement

Newsom's Team Responds

Governor Newsom’s spokesperson, Izzy Gardon, criticized the lawsuit as “deeply unserious,” defending the law’s aim to “preserve the child-parent relationship.” 

Advertisement
Governor Gavin Newsom at a podium, gesturing while speaking to an audience

Source: Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Newsom’s office remains confident that the state will prevail against these legal challenges.

Transparency vs. Privacy

The heart of the controversy lies in whether schools should have the ability to keep a student’s gender identity confidential. 

Advertisement
A close-up of a whiteboard held by hands, displaying "HELLO MY PRONOUNS ARE" followed by colorful text

Source: Alexander Grey/Unsplash

The new law mandates that such information can only be disclosed with the student’s consent, barring a few exceptions.

The Education Department's Role

The California Department of Education has been directed to develop resources to assist families of LGBTQ+ students. 

Advertisement
Close-up of a hand holding a dog tag with the word "EQUALITY" and an attached rainbow flag

Source: Michele Wales/Unsplash

This initiative is part of the broader law designed to facilitate open and informed discussions on sensitive topics related to gender identity among family members.

Advocates Applaud the Legislation

LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have praised the law, with Equality California’s Tony Hoang saying it “strengthens protections for LGBTQ+ youth against forced outing policies.” 

Two young individuals wrapped in a pride flag, smiling and looking at a smartphone, at a crowded outdoor event

Source: Josè Maria Sava/Unsplash

This support contrasts sharply with opponents who argue it undermines parental rights.

Advertisement

Opposition Voices Concerns

Critics like Jonathan Keller from the California Family Council argue that the law “undermines their fundamental role and places boys and girls in potential jeopardy.” 

Two men in suits smiling at the camera, one with a beard and one without, at a formal indoor gathering

Source: JonathanKeller/X

These concerns reflect a deep division on how best to balance rights and responsibilities in schools.

Advertisement

Elon Musk’s Reaction

The controversy has even caught the attention of billionaire Elon Musk.

Elon Musk, smiling, interacting with people in a semi-casual event setting, surrounded by a crowd partially visible in the foreground

Source: Wikimedia Commons

Musk cited the new law as a reason for moving SpaceX and social media platform X’s headquarters to Texas from California, signaling the broader implications of state policies on business decisions.

Advertisement

National Debate Echoes in California

This lawsuit is part of a broader national discussion about the rights of transgender students and parental rights in education. 

Neon signs in blue and pink lighting that read "BOYS" and "GIRLS,"

Source: Samuel Regan-Asante/Unsplash

The issue is becoming increasingly prominent as different states adopt varying policies on student privacy and parental notification.

Advertisement

Other States' Stances

While California seeks to protect student privacy, states like Alabama, Arkansas, and Indiana require schools to notify parents about changes related to gender identity.

Young students of diverse ethnic backgrounds engaged in a classroom activity with papers and craft materials on their desks.

Source: CDC/Unsplash

This showcases the differing approaches across the country.

Advertisement

The Judicial Angle

Recent actions include New Jersey’s Attorney General suing school districts over policies he claims violate anti-discrimination laws. 

A man in a suit speaking at a podium with the New Jersey State Police seal, addressing an audience out of focus in the foreground

Source: NewJerseyOAG/X

This highlights the ongoing legal battles related to gender identity in schools across the United States.

Advertisement

Involvement of National and State Legal Authorities

The issue has attracted the attention of both national and state legal authorities, with groups attempting to intervene in lawsuits and attorney generals from various states taking positions on the matter. 

A man in sunglasses and a black hat holding a sign that says "MY NON-BINARY CHILD IS MY HERO" with multicolored hearts

Source: Meg/Unsplash

This reflects the complex and contentious nature of balancing student rights and parental responsibilities.

Advertisement

Ballot Measure

Opponents of the law and supporters of parental notification for gender expression previously tried to get a ballot initiative approved to put in front of voters ahead of the November election.

Close-up of two hands, one holding an envelope-style ballot, about to insert it into a slot on a metal ballot box

Source: Arnaud Jaegers/Unsplash

However, the ballot measure narrowly failed to get enough signatures to qualify, getting 400,000 of the 546,651 required.

Advertisement

Support for Notification

Jonathan Zachreson, who had helped organize the campaign for the ballot measure, expressed disappointment but felt that the signatures they got proved there was support for parental rights to know about their children’s gender identity.

A father and son discussing while looking at a laptop.

Kenny Eliason/Unsplash

“While we are disappointed we didn’t meet the threshold to qualify for the ballot, we are encouraged by the amount of support from every sector of the state,” said Zachreson.

Advertisement

Zachreson’s Statement

Now, months after the ballot measure had failed, Zachreson released a statement following the passage of the notification ban law.

Governor Gavin Newsom standing behind a lectern looking serious.

Office of the Governor of California/Wikimedia Commons

“I am disappointed the Governor signed AB 1955. Not only is this bill an affront to families, but it could also damage our local economy. As someone committed to ensuring Roseville remains a great place to live and raise a family, this is deeply concerning,” wrote Zachreson on X.

Advertisement

More Attacks

Republican lawmakers have been decrying the law ever since it was signed by Governor Newsom and have called for it to be repealed.

The Republican logo. It's a red elephant with three white stars at the top.

Republican Party/Wikimedia Commons

“Gavin Newsom’s latest attack on Parents Rights, AB 1955, has put billions of dollars in federal education funding in jeopardy.  I am calling on the Legislature to immediately repeal the law or suspend its implementation pending legal action,” said California Congressman Kevin Kiley on X.

Advertisement

Heart of the Issue

The crux of the disagreement between supporters of Newsom’s law and detractors has to do with the rights of parents to know about gender changes.

A person holding both hands together. Each hand has one of the letters for LGBTQIA+ on.

Alexander Grey/Unsplash

Advocates argue that schools should not be obligated to inform parents because of the risks that LGBT students face, while critics say that schools keeping secrets from parents damages the trust of the institutions.

Advertisement

Secrets from Parents

A recent piece by Abigail Shrier highlighted the concern some parents have about schools isolating parents from their kids.

A person hiding in the dark with their shadow on the wall.

Source: Ammar Sabaa/Unsplash

“Child predators follow a common playbook: target the victim, gain their trust, fill a need, and, crucially, isolate the child from her parents. For several years, this has also been standard California state protocol with regard to schoolchildren questioning their gender identities. On Monday, this scheme became law,” Shrier wrote.

Advertisement

Danger to LGBT Students

Those who support the notification ban fear the consequences of “outing” the gender identity of students in response to increasing harmful rhetoric and attacks on LGBT Americans.

A heart is drawn on a rainbow in a persons open hand.

Source: Alexander Grey/Unsplash

According to the Human Rights Campaign, attacks based on gender identity spiked by 32.9% in 2023 over the previous year.

Advertisement

Keeping Children Safe

Brandon Richards, a spokesperson for Newsom, emphasized the importance of preventing officials from interfering in parent-children relationships and keeping children safe in the wake of the law’s passage.

A child reading a book.

Source: Michał Parzuchowski/Unsplash

“This law helps keep children safe while protecting the critical role of parents,” said Richards. “It protects the child-parent relationship by preventing politicians and school staff from inappropriately intervening in family matters and attempting to control if, when, and how families have deeply personal conversations.”

Advertisement

Online Reaction

As one might predict, the reaction to the new law and Newsom’s signing has been split among people by political lines online.

A laptop shrouded in darkness.

Source: Jared Brashier/Unsplash

“That is absolutely disgusting. Parents are the most important people in a child’s life and they do need to know everything about their own children,” said an X user.

Advertisement

Musk’s Comments

On X, tech billionaire Elon Musk reacted to the news of Newsom signing the law, saying “the state will take away your kids in California.”

Elon Musk sitting with his hands clasped, looking reflective during an interview, with a blurred background

Source: Daniel Oberhause/Wikimedia Commons

This post was seen over 46 million times and got over 300,000 likes. Musk subsequently announced the intent to move Space X to Texas from California in protest.

Advertisement

Dangerous Rhetoric

In the wake of Musk’s comments and backlash online, some LGBT advocates have pushed back against the hate.

Elon Musk sitting down in a chair.

Source: Public Domain/Wikimedia Commons

“@elonmusk We will not be intimidated by your economic blackmail at the expense of the LGBTQ community, especially our kids,” said New York Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal in response to Musk announcing he wanted to move Space X after the notification ban.

Advertisement

More Bans

Hoylman-Sigal on X announced that would also be introducing legislation to protect trans kids from school districts notifying parents in New York.

The government capitol building located in Albany, New York.

Source: Bluefill/Wikimedia

“I’ll be introducing legislation banning school districts in NY from requiring teachers to out trans kids to their parents,” Hoylman-Sigal wrote on X.

Advertisement